Perverts Have No Right to Choose Bathrooms!

Amp316b

The push for normal people to accept and embrace transsexual deviancy has gone completely insane!  A few towns in North Carolina passed laws trying to force the vast majority of people to bend to the twisted, sick will of a super minority of trannies who want to share bathrooms with your children.  The state legislature put a halt to that madness and liberals went nuts.  It’s as if drag queens always had the right to share a bathroom with your 4 year old daughter and evil Christians just stole that God given right away from them!

Now we have Obama giving decrees to all schools in America, ordering them to allow people to use the bathroom of their choice.  Our country has officially gone mad!  The President of the United States has no such power.  The Constitution enumerates presidential powers in Article 2 and handing down decrees or executive orders to the American People is not there.  Determining where people can urinate is also not a federally enumerated power.

The Decree Obama issued is long winded and tyrannical.  Obama says, “Every child deserves to attend school in a safe, supportive environment that allows them to thrive and grow.”  Of course this only means sexually deviant children with deplorable, liberal parents, not Christian children.  They deserve no support.  Support for the religious freedom of Christians is banned from school.  Obama goes on by saying, “The guidance explains that when students or their parents, as appropriate, notify a school that a student is transgender, the school must treat the student consistent with the student’s gender identity.”  Must?  Who is Obama to tell anyone what they must do?  Obama is not a king.  The only thing anyone must do is ignore the tyrant.  Click here for the full decree issued by Obama via the Department of Justice:  Obama Tranny Decree.

The Family Leader web site did a wonderful job of putting bullet points to some of mandates Obama is unilaterally demanding of our schools.  Please visit their site to help them organize a response!

  • Dictates that boys who self-identify as female be allowed to use girls’ locker rooms and shower facilities, and vice versa.
  • Specifically states that making a gender-neutral, single-stall bathroom available to transgender students is insufficient. If a girls’ bathroom or locker room exists, boys and men who identify as female must be allowed entry, and vice versa.
  • Dictates that students must be allowed to play the sport of the gender they self-identify.
  • Specifically states that a student may self-identify his or her gender to the school without parental permission or knowledge.
  • Forbids any medical requirements as a prerequisite of new gender identity.
  • Dictates that on school field trips, boys who self-identify as female must be allowed to sleep in the same hotel rooms as female students, and vice versa. Providing a private hotel room for a transgender student is not allowed unless all students are lodged in private rooms.

The Founding Fathers did not enumerate any power to the federal government to control who we associate with.  The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was completely unconstitutional.  The people were lulled into giving up rights under the guise of civility, because racism was seen as cruel.  In the name of fairness, the Constitution was ignored and Congress passed the Civil Rights Act, which affected the entire country to address the actions of people in a few towns.  The premise behind the Civil Rights Act wasn’t necessarily a bad one.  The point is that it wasn’t the Federal Government’s business.  Controlling our behavior is not the role of the Federal Government.  The 10th Amendment leaves these powers to the States.  If you don’t like how you are treated in your state, you can vote with your feet by moving to another state.  For the Civil Rights Act to have been legitimate, it would have to have been an Amendment to the Constitution, ratified by 75% of the states.  Violating the Constitution to legislate it in Congress, said one thing: it didn’t have enough support to be legitimately ratified as a Constitutional Amendment.

Does anyone believe that without The Civil Rights Act, anyone could open a business today and ban black people or give them a designated seating area and still stay in business?  If they did, would it really hurt anyone?  We don’t have to patronize any business we don’t agree with.  We can always go somewhere else or even open our own business.  Congress addressed a temporary and localized problem with an overarching law that has caused far more problems than it ever solved.  We are not one country with one set of rules, problems, and economic situations, as most countries are.  We are 50 states with hundreds of cultures and this is why most legislation of domestic laws was left to states and localities.

The Civil Rights Act was intended to mandate racial fairness.  Now it’s intent is being twisted in the attempt to include any form of behavior that the vast majority of Americans are uncomfortable with.  The Civil Rights Act is being used to compel immorality. The left uses the it to force Christian bakers to bake gay wedding cakes against their religious beliefs, even though homosexuals are not protected by the act.  Now we’re told that we’ve been guilty all along of violating the rights of perverts by keeping men out of the girls bathroom, so we need to fix it!

If you own a business and you want to allow bathroom choice to perverts or spend your own money to build a third bathroom just for degenerates, then you are free to do so.  Any government mandate on a business to accommodate behavior the owner and customers find abhorrent, is a violation of the rights of normal people.  Mandates such as these coming from a federal level are completely unconstitutional, more so if it is by Presidential decree.   

President Obama has threatened to revoke federal funding from schools that don’t comply with his decree.  Great!  This federal funding is unconstitutional. Finally we have some motivation to reject it!  States should refuse the funding and completely opt out of Department of Education control.  There is no need for the federal funding.  The carrot the federal government dangles is poisoned.  Federal funding doesn’t make up for the harm caused by Department of Education regulations and the liberal curriculum forced on our children.  Our states and local communities are much better suited to control our school systems.

Religion, which is constitutionally protected, has been banned from our schools.  Children wearing clothing that celebrates constitutional rights like the 2nd Amendment or showing support for military heroes, have been sent home to change clothes.  We have seen growing intolerance from liberals for anything patriotic and American being taught or displayed in our public schools.  If anything should be banned in our schools it is transvestitism and transgenderism.  There is no reason that our children should be subjected to this filth when we are paying for them to learn.  The 99% of children who are normal, don’t need their education disrupted by the abnormal who are immoral.  The Anti-Bully Agenda is designed to force LGBT tolerance.  The last place children should have their expectation of normalcy and privacy violated is in the bathroom and locker room of their schools.

Shame on Barack Hussein Obama!  He has no right to be involved with this.  This unconstitutional blackmail of public schools by decree, which forces privacy violations on your children, is grounds for immediate impeachment.  States need to refuse to acknowledge Obama or better yet, voice stalwart refusal to obey and public condemnation of him.  Some states are getting tired of his abuse of power.

Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick said, “Obama can keep his 30 pieces of silver.”  Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin said, “It is difficult to imagine a more absurd federal overreach into a local issue.  Under the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the federal government has no authority to interfere in local school districts’ bathroom policies.”

Every state should follow the examples of Texas and Kentucky.   We don’t have to tolerate perverted behavior pushed in our faces anymore.  It’s time for states to start outlawing perversion again.

AMP (Anna Maria Perez)

If you enjoyed this blog post, please share on Facebook, Twitter or one of the other choices below!  Thank you!

14 comments

  1. So the Progressive College Agents say “1 in 4 women will be a victim of sexual assault.” This may or may not be true. Somehow, it’s hard to imagine asking someone out on a date again after being turned down as sexual assault. However, sticking to their very own narrative, if they “feel that 1 in 4 women have been victims of sexual assault, why would they make them relive the experience for the benefit of .4% of the population. Not only is the price to high; it demonstrates yet again the hypocrisy from which the Progressives operate.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. They must not know they’re playing with fire, mocking God and provoking his ire. Reprobate minds, more than I realized existed, came out in recent days and flipped the bird at all things sane and decent, throwing tantrums over our Governor’s stand on common sense, incensed that perverts can’t use the restroom of the opposite sex…

    From the White House and mayors to city council members, they came out swinging their swords against North Carolina’s “anti-LGBT” law, HB2. New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed an executive order banning travel to NC…Bruce Springsteen canceled his concert in Greensboro…And sorrow of sorrows, Michael Moore cancelled his new movie – boo-hoo!

    A Harvard law professor called for a national “pee-in.” As one man put it, “If political correctness needed frogs to have hooves, a thousand PhDs in any field would line up and swear that frogs have hooves.”

    This Regime has launched a campaign against “Religious Freedom Legislation and Gender Stenotypes in Media and Toys”…The same Regime that lit the White House with a mock rainbow, celebrating the Supreme Court’s (predetermined) ruling on gay marriage. And now, here he is, blackmailing public schools. Parents, get your children in the ark!

    We are witnessing an all-out war on reality. Like individuals, nations reap what they sow. America has sown to the flesh and we’re now reaping a harvest of corruption. As Robert P. George said, “Where virtue is disdained and vice is glorified, corruption and demagoguery are the harvest.”

    At the rate this wicked and perverse generation in going, who’d be surprised if the next high court ruling came down in favor of pedophilia or incest or bestiality? How about human trafficking – as reports have it that some of our government officials are involved in this heinous crime.

    Is it time to call fire down from heaven yet?

    Liked by 1 person

    • You mentioned the SCOTUS ruling on same sex marriage. I am often accused of homophobia when I point out that the SCOTUS had no jurisdiction in that case since, by virtue of the 10th amendment, marriage is not something that the federal government has control over.They bring up the SCOTUS ruling that said that banning interracial marriage should be legal and I again tell them that they have no jurisdiction over marriage.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Right. It’s none of the federal government’s business, whether it be Congress, the President or the Courts. We didn’t charter the federal government to be our nanny. Whether you want to call it racist or not, it’s up to States. If you live in a racist state and don’t like it, do something about it in your state or move.

        Like

  3. I think the most important point in your commentary is the fact that this federal overreach might just be the catalyst to spur states to totally reject federal $$$ and the strings attached to it. This latest “suggestion” from the Feds and the threat to withhold funding amounts to nothing less than extortion. ENOUGH!!!

    Note: I think you repeated your last paragraph.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks! Yes, I kept having a problem with this one where what I typed would be mirrored at the bottom for some reason. I had to keep deleting it while editing it in WordPress’s editor. It started after I saved a draft and came back to work on it later. I thought I got it all. hehe

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Going by their own rules one does not even have to dress like a woman. Ones attire could be all mens clothes. Not showing a sign of feminism. One could be dressed as a jock.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I still think this all just a deflection to keep the simpleminded riled up and not looking at what is actually going on. Awesome article again Anna

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I am so glad I receive your blog. Your blog confirmed that I was right saying that Obama’s directive to schools was illegal. Thank you for sharing your knowledge with your followers.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment